Lawyers client intimidating
If so, we expect that your client must have agreed to or been promised a non-prosecution agreement, immunity agreement, or some other negotiated resolution of the potential criminal charges. [employee] had admitted to fraud at his prior [Platinum] position, and we understand no such disclosure has been made.If that were the case, [CW-1’s subsequent employer] undoubtedly would have been required to disclose to its investors that its . In other words, Nordlicht’s lawyers are telling CW-1 that if he did indeed help the government out in exchange for protection, the firm he currently works at should have put that info on blast. It’s possible that, in the course of defending Nordlicht on multiple charges of securities fraud, the fine folks at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP have been seized with a sudden passion for investor protection and robust disclosure practices.Our attorneys are available to assist in drafting and reviewing your important business contracts and to provide representation during negotiations and contract dispute litigation. Healthcare Doctors and other medical professionals and institutions face industry-specific challenges during business formation and operation.
Our incorporation lawyers advise clients of how to form not-for-profit organizations and help them understand and observe ongoing compliance requirements. Contact us and find out more about how we contribute to your success. Prosecutors told the judge that they have “serious concerns” about a letter sent by lawyers for Platinum founder Mark Nordlicht, which they say makes a “veiled threat to the Previous Employee relating to the Previous Employee’s post-Platinum employment.” That’s not a light allegation!To back it up they attached the letter CW-1’s counsel received from Nordlicht’s lawyers.Their cooperating witness is a former employee – a “senior” one, according to the defense – known affectionately to the feds CW-1.
What you wouldn’t want, however, is the defense sending creepy and vaguely threatening letters to CW-1’s counsel, as the government alleges in a recent court filing.The Nordlicht Letter continues: We find it implausible that [CW-1] made these statements.